Display:


You Are Dead On (2.00 / 4)

When Olbermann started attacking Dems, he lost all lustre.


I proudly support Barack Obama for President!
by Zeitgeist9000 on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 02:45:33 PM EST

It was uncomfortable for me (2.00 / 2)

To watch him on with say Alter, or a Robinson, and do the tricky dance where they both were going to try to act like real journalists and not show any bias, but at the same time do right by the guy they were backing, while sticking daggers in his opponent.

I like it better when he just blasts Bush/ Cheney / Rove with commonsense arguements.


by RichardFlatts on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 02:49:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You Are Dead On (2.00 / 2)

IMO
Everyone knows Olbermann is a liberal; fine, as a centrist, I have no problem with that. Here's the problem, he has an agenda that he's trying to sell to his audience through his "special" comments and other means. Also, his continous attacks on O'Reilly now looks a bit obsessive.

I have a feeling his rating have gone down.


by soyousay on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 03:03:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not so much (2.00 / 2)

I have a feeling his rating have gone down.

Countdown with Keith Olbermann grew 49% year-to-year in the A25-54 demo. The program came in second in the demo at 8pmET during July, averaging 334,000 to CNN's 192,000 (excluding July 4)

However, O'Reilly is still narrowly winning the time slot.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 03:11:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not so much (none / 0)

I'd like to see the stats on that. I bet he picked up younger viewers and lost some older ones (like me.)


by soyousay on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 03:21:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not so much (none / 0)

That's as far as the breakdown went 25-54 Demo.

My sense is he has lost Clinton partisans since the infamous Hillary Special Comment. In the meantime I would also guess his demo does trend younger.

Then again I'm 60 and I watch fairly regularly.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 03:49:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not so much (none / 0)

Agreed...Olbermann is a partisan Obama supporter.


by soyousay on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 03:56:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not so much (2.00 / 1)

Just like... Hillary Clinton. I heard she's openly endorsing him now! Gosh! What has happened to objectivity?

(Yes, let's keep dragging out yesterday's battles instead of fighting tomorrow's)


Visit Election Inspection for analysis, polls, and predictions!
by X Stryker on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 04:32:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

she's not a "news anchor" (none / 0)

...and your point is?


by soyousay on Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 04:42:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: she's not a "news anchor" (none / 0)

Tons of opinion journalists, only one liberal. My point is move on and let Keith be Keith - he's all we got.


Visit Election Inspection for analysis, polls, and predictions!
by X Stryker on Fri Aug 22, 2008 at 11:17:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not so much (none / 0)

Olbermann is a partisan Obama supporter.

Which is why he did a special comment condemning Obama's FISA vote?


"I don't know too much about Sarah Palin, but perhaps that's the good news." -- GOP Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
by Obama44 on Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 01:16:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]